HomepageISTEEdSurge
Skip to content
ascd logo

Log in to Witsby: ASCD’s Next-Generation Professional Learning and Credentialing Platform
Join ASCD
September 1, 2024
Vol. 82
No. 1
Instructional Insights

Checking for Understanding

author avatar
author avatar

premium resources logo

Premium Resource

AssessmentInstructional Strategies
A stack of four wooden blocks, two of which have check marks on them representing student understanding
Credit: Ratana21 / Shutterstock
The link between teaching and learning is assessment: When teachers collect and analyze evidence, they can determine what students have learned and what they still need to learn. This process of checking for understanding should influence future instruction that students receive. Since understanding develops over time, teachers can use short, medium, and long cycles of assessment to increase the likelihood that students are learning (Wiliam, Fisher, & Frey, 2024).

Short-Cycle Assessments

These assessments are implemented within and between lessons, often several times during the lesson. They allow teachers to adjust the learning experiences in real time as the lesson unfolds. For example, asking students to respond to a poll or summarize their learning in writing during the lesson provides teachers with evidence of students’ current understanding. Using this information, teachers may decide to reteach a concept, meet with a small group of students, or accelerate the pace of the learning.

Medium-Cycle Assessments

Some assessments span several days or even weeks and occur at the end of major chunks of learning. These medium-cycle assessments give teachers the ability to revise future lessons based on students’ progress during or between units. For example, a quiz, practice test, or presentation provides teachers with information about students’ learning and understanding at specific points during the unit. Using this information, future lessons can be adjusted or skipped, depending on student performance. Medium-cycle assessment can be used by teacher teams to discuss teachers’ impact and generate ideas for improving students’ learning.

Teachers should regularly collect evidence from their students as they are learning and plan future instruction to accelerate learning.

Author Image

Long-Cycle Assessments

These interim assessments serve as benchmarks across the academic year. Unlike short- and medium-cycle assessments, long-cycle assessments provide teachers with a longer view of what learning has occurred thus far, and how to gauge future learning such that teachers can pace instruction to meet course objectives. These can include longer projects, essays, and more formal approaches such as district benchmark tests. Long-cycle assessments provide teachers with information about their impact over longer periods of time. In addition to allowing teachers to adjust future units, the evidence from these assessments can be used to identify additional areas of intervention for students who are not yet responding to teachers’ ongoing efforts to adjust their learning ­experiences.
In the video that accompanies this column, high school English teacher Marnitta George observes her students as they engage in a close reading. She uses several short-cycle assessments to check for understanding and guide her interactions with students. Notice the non-verbal cues she picks up on and the questions she asks her students as they are engaged in writing. These short-cycle assessments inform her future mid-cycle assessment, which is a longer essay they are writing, and the eventual long-cycle assessment, an essay comparing several texts on the same topic.
There are several ways to check for understanding, including these three that Ms. George is using in her class (Fisher & Frey, 2014):
  • Non-verbal. Watching students as they engage in learning tasks provides teachers with information that they can use to adjust the learning. Teachers who develop expert noticing skills recognize when students are not understanding or applying what they are learning. For example, a teacher may notice that students have a strong number sense and then accelerate the lesson to focus on tasks that will challenge students. Or the teacher may notice that students use extensive personal connections while discussing texts and push them to integrate evidence from the text in their responses.
  • Questions. Asking questions is the most common tool that teachers use to check for understanding, but it is not always the most effective because questions might be literal or too basic. For example, closed-ended questions prompt responses that are restricted to a limited set of possibilities, so they typically provide teachers with information about students’ surface-level understanding of factual and detail-oriented information. Open-ended questions, in contrast, allow for a free-form response to understand student thinking. They are more useful for checking for understanding because they provide teachers with opportunities to clarify what students understand and to probe knowledge and application.
  • Writing. When students write, they share their thinking. Sometimes, writing helps students clarify their thinking. Analyzing student writing provides teachers with information about student understanding and what they still need to learn. Essays are not the only writing students should do to demonstrate their understanding. Shorter writing pieces are also useful in checking for understanding. The key is to provide students with a prompt that allows them to share what they know. One short writing piece that is commonly used is RAFT (role, audience, format, and topic), which helps students develop perspective as they write (Santa & Havens, 1995).

Recognize Strengths Across Time

Regardless of the tools that are used to check for understanding, two points are important to consider. First, ensure that the assessment evidence that is collected builds over time. Short-cycle assessments should be logically connected with medium- and long-cycle assessments. Lack of alignment can result in missed opportunities to extend student learning. When assessment tools are nested, student understanding is monitored across time. Second, look for student strengths. When teachers choose to focus on strengths and assets, they are more likely to uphold high expectations for students, rather than focusing on deficits or gaps in learning. This positive mindset also ­reinforces teachers’ confidence because they recognize the impact they are having. In sum, teachers should regularly collect evidence from their students as they are learning, recognize the strengths their students demonstrate, and plan future instruction to accelerate learning.
premium resources logoAssessment

Instructional Insights / 3 Ways to Gauge Student Understanding

1 month ago

Video Reflection: Assessment in Action

After watching the video, take the following steps to reflect on how you assess student understanding.
  1. Describe the current ways that you check for understanding. In which categories do they fit (non-verbal, questioning, writing, or others)? Is there a need to add additional tools?
  2. In the video, Ms. George first focuses on success criteria. What role do the success criteria play in her future assessment tasks?
  3. Identify places in the video in which Ms. George notices her students’ understanding. What actions does she take based on what she noticed?
  4. Identify places in the video where Ms. George asks a question of her students. What actions does she take based on student responses?
  5. Create an assessment grid for an upcoming unit of learning. Identity short-cycle, medium-cycle, and long-cycle assessment tools. You may use a table like this:
Fisher Frey Sept 24 Table
References

Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2014). Checking for understanding: ­Formative assessment techniques for your classroom (2nd ed.). ASCD.

Santa, C., & Havens, L. (1995). Creating independence through student-owned strategies: Project CRISS. Kendall-Hunt.

Wiliam, D., Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2024). Student assessment: Better evidence, better decisions, better learning. Corwin.

Doug Fisher is a professor of educational leadership at San Diego State University, where he focuses on policies and practices in literacy and school leadership. Additionally, he is a teacher leader at Health Sciences High & Middle College, an award-winning, open-enrollment public school in the City Heights neighborhood of San Diego that he cofounded in 2007. His areas of interest include instructional design, curriculum development, and professional learning. A passionate educator, Fisher's work is dedicated to impacting professional learning communities and nurturing the knowledge and skills of caring teachers and school leaders so they may help students improve their learning and attain their goals and aspirations.

Fisher is a member of the California Reading Hall of Fame as well as the recipient of an International Reading Association William S. Grey citation of merit and Exemplary Leader award from the Conference on English Leadership of NCTE. Previously, he was an early intervention teacher and elementary school educator. He has published numerous articles and books on literacy and leadership, teaching and learning, and improving student achievement.

 

Learn More

ASCD is a community dedicated to educators' professional growth and well-being.

Let us help you put your vision into action.
Related Articles
View all
undefined
Assessment
The Unwinnable Battle Over Minimum Grades
Thomas R. Guskey & Douglas Fisher et al.
4 days ago

undefined
A Protocol for Teaching Up in Daily Instruction
Kristina Doubet
4 days ago

undefined
The Fundamentals of Formative Assessment
Paul Emerich France
1 month ago

undefined
The Value of Descriptive, Multi-Level Rubrics
Jay McTighe & Susan M. Brookhart et al.
7 months ago

undefined
Giving Retakes Their Best Chance to Improve Learning
Thomas R. Guskey
1 year ago
Related Articles
The Unwinnable Battle Over Minimum Grades
Thomas R. Guskey & Douglas Fisher et al.
4 days ago

A Protocol for Teaching Up in Daily Instruction
Kristina Doubet
4 days ago

The Fundamentals of Formative Assessment
Paul Emerich France
1 month ago

The Value of Descriptive, Multi-Level Rubrics
Jay McTighe & Susan M. Brookhart et al.
7 months ago

Giving Retakes Their Best Chance to Improve Learning
Thomas R. Guskey
1 year ago
From our issue
Magazine cover titled 'Helping New Teachers Thrive' featuring a yellow background and a green pencil with a small sprout growing from the top, symbolizing growth and thriving
Helping New Teachers Thrive
Go To Publication