1703 North Beauregard St.
Alexandria, VA 22311-1714
Tel: 1-800-933-ASCD (2723)
8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. eastern time, Monday through Friday
Local to the D.C. area: 1-703-578-9600, press 2
Toll-free from U.S. and Canada: 1-800-933-ASCD (2723), press 2
All other countries: (International Access Code) + 1-703-578-9600, press 2
by Charlotte Danielson
Table of Contents
School improvement does not happen by itself. Serious school improvement, along the lines described in this book, does not consist of merely fiddling around the edges of the school's organization, implementing a single new program, or establishing a partnership with a business in the community; rather, the process should be comprehensive and should encompass everything done in the school. Research confirms what educators know well from their own experience: that visionary leadership makes an extraordinary difference in any complex undertaking. A comprehensive project of school improvement requires clarity of vision, breadth of view, and a determination to overcome inevitable obstacles that permits others to participate with confidence. Many teachers are weary of constant change, and are not convinced that the latest new program will be any improvement over the old way of doing things. Because teachers recognize that they will likely still be teaching at the same school long after the principal has left, they can easily adopt an attitude of “this too shall pass.”
Leaders of serious school improvement efforts face the challenge of marshalling the energy and expertise of their staff in the service of the project. A leader's skills extend far beyond running meetings efficiently; clarifying a vision for school improvement, helping staff members to understand how their daily work supports (or possibly undermines) the vision, and serving as an advocate for both students and staff are all critical for success. It is essential that teachers and support staff regard their actions in light of the core mission of the school: ensuring student success.
Leadership does not reside solely with administrators; in many schools, team leaders or department chairs also serve as educational leaders. However, administrators must also develop and exercise strong leadership. The very positions of principal and assistant principal include within their job descriptions the exercise of leadership within the school; without this leadership, no school improvement effort can succeed. The activities described in this chapter are assumed to be under the direction of a visionary administrative leader who sees the big picture as well as the details and who can help a school's staff maintain forward momentum.
The foundation of any school program is predicated on a clear grasp of the school's goals, belief structure, and research base. Any school improvement effort should begin with consensus in those areas.
It is essential for a school community to be exceedingly clear about its broad goals, which should encompass student learning, the professional culture, and the school's relationship with its larger community. Some goals, particularly those related to student achievement, will later be articulated in the school's curriculum; one reasonable aim, therefore, might be for all students to master the curriculum. Other goals might include the establishment of a professional culture of collaborative inquiry, a positive environment for students and their families, and links with the broader community.
Many schools have experience developing mission statements, and thus will have given thought to these goals. Such statements typically reflect a philosophy, and include such broad objectives as “helping each student reach his or her potential” or “meeting the intellectual, social, and physical needs of all students.” Some mission statements may overlap with statements of “what we want.” Unlike the former, however, the latter must be written in a manner that provides specific direction. A set of statements about “what we want” might look something like this:
In general, fewer goals are better than more; as will be seen later in this chapter, just a few significant goals can generate many demands for data collection and analysis. In addition, each broad goal includes a number of sub-goals, each of which should be examined and analyzed individually.
School practices rest on assumptions that are deeply held but frequently unexamined by both educators and the community, virtually ensuring that schools are resistant to meaningful change. Any process of school improvement must include systematic attention to the beliefs that influence action, policies, and practices in the school. This process is not easy, and suggests an important role for leadership. Educators must connect beliefs to actions and point out when certain actions are incompatible with stated beliefs. The examination of beliefs is challenging and may be uncomfortable, since the beliefs may stand in contrast sharply with facts. It is easy to adopt noble-sounding but essentially superficial belief statements, such as the ubiquitous “all children can learn.” Such a statement, when combined with the extensive evidence that not all students are in fact learning well, cries out for an explanation. If all children can learn, but only a small percentage has passed the state's test of its content standards, why is this? If a school also adopts the belief that “schools control the conditions of success,” then its educators can't let themselves off the hook for poor student performance.
These considerations confront educators with another challenge: namely, their own professional confidence. If a school adopts the belief that all students can achieve at high levels if they apply themselves and commit to learning, the teachers must believe that they can make good on the promise; adults in a school must believe that—through their work in the classroom and with the programs, policies, and procedures they establish in the school—they can ensure successful learning by all students.
Unfortunately, not all educators have this much confidence in their own abilities; perhaps their professional preparation was weak, or they are not aware of new developments in instructional approaches, or maybe they lack sufficient time to prepare lessons that ensure student engagement and learning. Whatever the case, many educators fear that they don't have what it takes to guarantee student success, and it becomes easier for them to blame anything—students, parents, the schedule, the system—but themselves for the poor performance of their students. Lacking confidence in their own abilities, many educators succumb to the prevailing social attitude that school success is highly correlated with the socioeconomic status of students' families and that there is not a lot they can do to overcome this fact.
The process used to establish a school's beliefs must respect the highly personal nature of these types of beliefs and their tight connection to results. Those leading the process of establishing beliefs for a school must ensure that everyone involved is treated with respect, and that individuals are not cornered into defending beliefs that might undermine the school's goals: for example, a teacher who defends the bell curve on the grounds that it maintains high standards should not be attacked for his views. But if the school culture is such that the teacher cannot admit to his beliefs, the beliefs will simply go “underground,” continu-ing to influence his practice, but hidden from pub-lic view. The professional culture must be one of respect and mutual exploration; individuals must feel safe stating their views. They must also be pro-vided time and support to change them.
Educators in any school trying to improve student learning must stay abreast of current research in education, psychology, organizational development, and so on. This is a tall order, made more challenging by the following factors:
Schools must adopt a coherent approach to keeping current with research. One possibility is as follows:
Because these activities satisfy requirements for professional development, they may be undertaken by teachers without the sense that they are yet another burden added to their already overloaded jobs.
It is not unusual for a school to inherit policies and practices that are inconsistent with its own stated beliefs and goals or disavowed by recent research. Many schools operate without a clearly defined curriculum, approach to scheduling, or system of learning support. Such practices can per-sist without anyone really noticing that they are actually undermining the school's stated goals with respect to student learning. Unless these practices are changed, the desired results will never be achieved.
Student attendance and homework policies at a school may be incompatible with a success orientation, or the school's procedures for teacher evaluation or professional development may not contribute to a culture of respect and professional inquiry. And a school's master schedule may make it more difficult to implement the type of instruction that teachers believe would promote higher levels of student learning. Of course, revising these systems is not a small undertaking; the procedures have usually been in place for a long time and are familiar to the students and staff. Even if educators are inclined to revise certain policies and practices, there is a limit to the number of major initiatives that a school's staff can manage simultaneously; many schools encounter “reform fatigue” when they embark on multiple projects at the same time or in rapid succession. On the other hand, dysfunctional practices should not be permitted to remain intact, particularly if they are actually working at cross-purposes to the school's major goals.
There is no easy solution to this difficulty, which is chiefly a resource problem: Where should staff spend its time and energy? Which projects are most critical, and which can wait? Clearly, planning is essential. As deficiencies are noted, it is important that a plan enabling educators to address the most serious concerns first, followed by others of lower priority, be implemented.
Daily instruction is directly supported by, and cannot be wholly successful without, attending to the different aspects of the school program's organization. Teachers cannot teach well without a clear curriculum aligned to the state or district content standards, well-designed assessments, clear and flexible procedures for assigning students and teachers, and a learning support plan. Without these systems in place, teachers' efforts are seriously compromised; they simply cannot accomplish their best work.
Of course, if a school does not have a coherent curriculum or aligned assessments in place, it is not going to acquire them overnight. Such projects require considerable effort and time yet are critical for successful teaching and learning. If found to require attention, then, such matters should be addressed with all deliberate speed.
The quality movement has had an enormous impact on many companies in the private sector: by paying systematic attention to the details of their operations, companies have seen increased productivity, efficiency, and customer satisfaction. Employees at companies that invest in quality initiatives typically experience a considerable degree of job satisfaction as a result of their direct participation in (and sense of responsibility for) the company. If the company manufactures products, there are fewer defects and returns and less waste. If the company sells insurance, records are well kept, customer satisfaction is high, and profits are healthy. And in all cases, employee morale is high, deriving from a sense of satisfaction that comes from a job well done.
Although few schools have made a formal commitment to a quality program, all can implement many aspects of such an approach. School improvement requires educators to define and identify indicators of that success; it also involves an unflinching examination of evidence (typically through data collection and analysis) and an uncompromising commitment to action.
For each of a school's goals, educators must determine indicators of success, the school's current degree of attainment, and reasonable targets for improvement. In order to do this, they must pay particular attention to how the goals are assessed. Clearly, the evidence of different types of goals must be appropriate to each type. And student test scores on standardized tests are only one among many sources of evidence; although they are important pieces of information, they fail to provide anything like a comprehensive answer to the question of “how are we doing.” As practition-ers recognize the power of becoming data-driven, they must take seriously the matter of determining what serve as indicators of success for all their important goals. Figure 14.1 is intended to provide educators with guidance for local thinking and decision making about data collection and analysis, but is not an ironclad prescription for program evaluation.
Sources of Evidence
High Level Learning for All Students
All students have access to a rigorous curriculum
Students are taught for understanding, in a challenging curriculum, rather than only rote repetition.
Students learn at high levels
Virtually all students master the basic (but rigorous) curriculum.
All students succeed at high levels
High averages do not conceal large differences in achievement between different subgroups of students.
A rich and varied school program
The school program develops not only cognitive skills, but also interpersonal skills, dispositions, aesthetics, athletics, and responsibility.
A Positive Culture for Students
Environment physically safe and attractive
The physical environment is free of hazards such as peeling paint, falling ceilings, violent weapons, and nonfunctioning water fountains and restrooms. In addition, equipment and supplies are adequate, student work is displayed, and the environment conveys a focus on learning.
Environment emotionally safe
The school environment is a safe place for students, tolerant of diversity of appearance and views.
Hard work valued and rewarded
Student perseverance, effort, and application are cultivated and rewarded.
School culture recognizes student excellence in many arenas
Student contributions and achievements (progress as well as absolute levels) in scholarship, the arts, athletics, etc., receive recognition.
Awards, displays of student work, and public recognition of student achievement includes virtually all students.
Analysis of recognition patterns
Students have multiple opportunities for success
Initial difficulty in learning is not perceived, by students or teachers, to indicate that success is not possible.
Students have multiple opportunities for initiative, responsibility, and leadership
Students are viewed not only as “clients” of the school, but also as contributing partners to its culture; they deliberate on issues that affect them and serve in roles such as office and laboratory aides, tutors to younger students, etc.
A Culture of Professional Inquiry for Teachers
All teachers engaged in high-quality professional learning
Professional development is self-directed, is focused on enhanced student learning, is job-embedded and collaborative, and is continuous and ongoing.
Professional inquiry is recognized and rewarded
There are opportunities for teachers to share and celebrate their investigations and findings.
The sources of evidence named in this chart are fairly extensive, and may include more data than educators in many schools are able to collect. Of course, some sources can serve as evidence for multiple goals: for example, a single student survey could be designed to provide information on students' views about the school's atmosphere of safety, its rewards for hard work, and their opportunities for leadership within the school.
Few schools would ever collect and analyze all the data suggested in Figure 14.1; choices must be made and priorities set according to the time and energy available. Still, systematic planning is essential, and individual staff assignments for data collection must be able to be incorporated into normal school routines. In addition, educators should consider the effect of using data gathering and analysis for promoting a professional culture. When teachers disaggregate their end-of-course assessment results, for example, they gain insight into their teaching that is not available by any other means. Similarly, a group of teachers can identify areas of their school's curriculum needing improvement by analyzing the state's assessment of content standards.
It is important for all teachers to be involved in data collection and analysis, as all educators should become more data-driven and more focused on results. Such an arrangement promotes a spirit of problem solving and collaboration, particularly when improving school performance is regarded (as it should be) as a team effort. Because of the time required for data collection and analysis, both activities must be carefully planned. In addition, different teachers should have different assignments: some could be responsible for designing and administering student surveys, for example, whereas others could be in charge of gathering information related to student attendance or analyzing course enrollments by student ethnicity.
Once school personnel have acquired comprehensive baseline data, they can use it to establish objectives for improvement. For example, if the data analysis reveals that 53 percent of the school's algebra students achieved a grade last year of A or B on the end-of-course exam (reflecting mastery of a given portion of the curriculum), teachers must establish a reasonable objective for the current year: would it be 60 percent or 65 percent?
Little else motivates people as well as do clear, worthwhile, and attainable objectives. They provide a focus for energy and action, and achieving them offers tremendous satisfaction to educators. Trivial goals invite trivial effort, and educators who attain them feel that they have not accomplished much. Worthwhile goals reflecting broad aspirations, on the other hand, encourage serious effort and yield great satisfaction when achieved.
Good objectives translate broad, long-term goals into prescriptions for action. In addition to being short-term, they are specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound—in other words, S.M.A.R.T.:
Action plans will reflect the same focus whether the established objectives are schoolwide or related to small groups of students. For example, if a survey reveals that students don't believe they have the opportunities to play leadership roles in the school, the issue of student leadership would probably be addressed at least initially as a matter for schoolwide decision making and action.
Clearly, the planning guidelines described in this chapter can be used by any school or even by individual teachers. Many states and districts mandate planning activities for their schools, and the plans that would emerge from the process discussed here would certainly meet their requirements.
Some might think of the collection and analysis of baseline data as a one-shot effort, particularly if it represents a departure from past practice. It may have required educators to plan and prioritize as well as to allocate resources beyond what had previously been dedicated to the purpose. It can only be hoped that such efforts, once expended, will have been seen to be valuable.
But the collection and analysis of data is not a one-shot affair; it must be a habit. Data regarding student achievement, attendance, and dropout rates must continue to be collected, disaggregated, and analyzed on a regular basis. Likewise, student, parent, and teacher attitudes; the condition of the physical plant; and activities with local businesses, colleges and universities, and community agencies must continue to be monitored.
Because most jobs require their employees to know how to collect and analyze data and commu-nicate the results, there is an important role here for students. Naturally, students of different ages will contribute differently to the effort, but all can play a part, whether by suggesting questions for the student survey, comparing this year's data to last year's, or determining the best approach—graph, table, raw numbers—to communicate the data analysis results to the entire school community.
This step is frequently skipped, and it should not be! By the time they have implemented an ambitious school improvement effort, many educators are too drained to step back and celebrate their efforts. They should, however, do so: recognition and celebration of progress is a high-profile activity that is most successful when broadly shared; students, parents, community, and all staff should be involved in meaningful ways. Members of the support staff should be recognized for their contributions to the life of the school. The celebration of progress should be a validation of the school's program and of its school improvement efforts, communicating to the entire community what the school is about, what it stands for, and what is important.
When educators “put it all together” to improve their schools for enhanced student learning and success, they enjoy the greatest exhilaration that the profession can offer: bringing their entire expertise to bear on providing a first-rate education to all children. What could be more exciting than that? The satisfaction of making a difference in the lives of young people, of seeing them become successful, is what keeps educators in this demanding and at times trying profession.
Copyright © 2002 by Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. All rights reserved.
No part of this publication—including the drawings, graphs, illustrations, or chapters, except for brief quotations in
critical reviews or articles—may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical,
including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from ASCD.
Subscribe to ASCD Express, our twice-monthly e-mail newsletter, to have practical, actionable strategies and information delivered to your e-mail inbox twice a month.
ASCD respects intellectual property rights and adheres to the laws governing them. Learn more about our permissions policy and submit your request online.