Conference Countdown
Atlanta, Ga.
April 2-4, 2016
  • membership
  • my account
  • help

    We are here to help!

    1703 North Beauregard Street
    Alexandria, VA 22311-1714
    Tel: 1-800-933-ASCD (2723)
    Fax: 703-575-5400

    8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Eastern time, Monday through Friday

    Local to the D.C. area, 703-578-9600, press 2

    Toll-free from U.S. and Canada, 1-800-933-ASCD (2723), press 2

    All other countries (International Access Code) + 1-703-578-9600, press 2

  • Log In
  • Forgot Password?


ASCD Annual Conference and Exhibit Show

2016 ASCD Annual Conference and Exhibit Show

Learn. Teach. Lead.
Get the tools to put it all together at this can't-miss education conference—with more than 200 sessions and five inspirational keynote speakers.

Learn more and register.



ASCD respects intellectual property rights and adheres to the laws governing them. Learn more about our permissions policy and submit your request online.

Policies and Requests

Translations Rights

Books in Translation

Premium, Select, and Institutional Plus Member Book (Jan 2003)
Log in to read this chapter.


What Works in Schools

by Robert J. Marzano

Table of Contents

Chapter 3. A Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum

The first school-level factor is a “guaranteed and viable curriculum.” I rank this as the first factor, having the most impact on student achievement. As indicated in Figure 2.3 (p. 19), a guaranteed and viable curriculum is primarily a combination of my factors “opportunity to learn” and “time” (Marzano, 2000a). Both have strong correlations with academic achievement, yet they are so interdependent that they constitute one factor.

Opportunity to Learn

Opportunity to learn (OTL) has the strongest relationship with student achievement of all school-level factors identified in Marzano (2000a). It was first introduced to the research literature more than 30 years ago by the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (Wilkins, 1997) when it became a component of the First, and then later, the Second International Mathematics Study (FIMS and SIMS, respectively) (Burstein, 1992; Husen, 1967a, 1967b). Apparently, OTL began as an afterthought in FIMS when researchers became concerned that all students might not have had an equal opportunity to learn the items being used to assess their mathematics achievement (Wilkins, 1997). Consequently, various measures of OTL were devised and its relationship to mathematics achievement examined. The findings, which seem self-evident now, were somewhat of a surprise to the FIMS researchers as indicated by the following quote from a FIMS technical report (Husen, 1967b):

One of the factors which may influence scores on an achievement examination is whether or not students have had an opportunity to study a particular topic or learn how to solve a particular type of problem presented by the test. (pp. 162–163)


You must be an ASCD Select or Premium member to view this content.

Log in.


Log in to submit a comment.

To post a comment, please log in above. (You must be an ASCD EDge community member.) Free registration