1703 North Beauregard St.
Alexandria, VA 22311-1714
Tel: 1-800-933-ASCD (2723)
8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. eastern time, Monday through Friday
Local to the D.C. area: 1-703-578-9600, press 2
Toll-free from U.S. and Canada: 1-800-933-ASCD (2723), press 2
All other countries: (International Access Code) + 1-703-578-9600, press 2
April 2004 | Volume 61 | Number 7
Leading in Tough Times
John H. Holloway
How do new principals gain the skills and knowledge they need to survive and thrive in their first years on the job? Lashway's research review (2003) found that
by all accounts, new administrators experience intense, unrelenting stress as they try to adjust their textbook understanding of leadership to the real world of practice.
He found that major sources of stress include the need to master technical skills; the demands of a wide range of constituents; personal feelings of inadequacy; the fast-paced environment; the task of supervising teachers; and most of all, the sense of isolation in their new role.
Brown, Anfara, Hartman, Mahar, and Mills (2001) surveyed 98 principals and interviewed 44 of them to examine the learning process of new administrators. They found that, unfortunately, many beginning principals learn their jobs through on-the-job training. When asked what methods would help them adjust more effectively, the survey participants cited sharing experiences with colleagues as a preferred activity.
Two studies of administrator shortages conducted by Educational Research Service (1998, 2000) confirmed beginning principals' need for collegial support. One of the opportunities for development that principals requested most frequently was the chance to network with other principals to exchange ideas, evaluate the demands of their jobs, and discuss how to implement change at their schools.
Mentoring programs can provide the collegial support that new principals need. Unfortunately, such programs are not available to most new principals. Fewer than half of the districts in Educational Research Service's 2000 survey had formal principal mentoring programs.
Researchers who have studied administrator mentoring programs have drawn some conclusions about the benefits of mentoring and the characteristics of effective programs.
Wilmore, McNeil, and Townzen (1999) studied one model of administrator mentoring based on an innovative collaborative program between the University of Texas at Arlington and the Dallas/Fort Worth public schools. This program for future school leaders featured a schedule of seminars and mentor-guided internship experiences that focused on school-based issues. During the first year, each administrative intern worked with an experienced principal mentor to choose and address a school improvement topic. This model of combining traditional seminar instruction with mentor-supported, field-based experiences proved effective. All participants successfully completed the preparation program, and all were hired for leadership positions of their choice.
Dukess (2001) interviewed mentors, mentees, and program supervisors in a new principal mentoring program in six New York City community school districts. The participants reported that the program's greatest benefit was having someone to talk with and consult for advice, thus lessening their feelings of isolation. The program also benefited the experienced school leaders who served as mentors, stretching their thinking about teaching and learning. On the basis of participants' reports, Dukess recommended that principal mentors should have relevant expertise as instructional leaders, strong interpersonal skills, a ready supply of ideas to meet the challenges faced by mentees, and good organization skills.
Howley, Chadwick, and Howley (2002) looked at a statewide Ohio mentoring program that supported new principals through a regional principal academy and a network of mentors. The program participants completed port-folios based on the Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium Standards for School Leaders, with the assistance of a cadre of trained mentors. Nearly three-fourths of the participants (69.6 percent) ranked mentors as the most crucial component of the program. Participants reported that their mentors had shared personal experiences relevant to their work, conveyed empathy for their concerns, communicated feelings of respect for participants, and helped them finish assignments on time.
Crocker and Harris (2002) gathered information from mentors and mentees in a principal preparation program to explore the participants' views on the important components of successful mentoring programs. These researchers concluded that mentoring programs should
Dukess's 2001 study affirmed some of the same points. She concluded that successful mentoring programs need to have the following characteristics: careful matching of mentors and mentees; clear expectations and guidelines for participants; an honest and trusting relationship between the mentor and mentee built on confidentiality; a nonsupervisory process, with mentors not required to judge job performance or to report performance to the mentee's superior; and a participatory relationship, in which mentors actually participate in some of the mentees' work.
Too often, school districts seem to assume that newly minted principals possess all the skills and abilities needed to lead their schools successfully. But the task of the new school leader can be lonely and intimidating. An effective mentoring program can greatly ameliorate the isolation felt by new administrators if it includes trained and competent mentors who engage their mentees in structured, thoughtful activities and experiences.
Brown, K., Anfara, V., Hartman, K., Mahar, R., & Mills, R. (2001). Professional development of middle-level principals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Seattle, WA. (ERIC Document No. ED 457 595)
Crocker, C., & Harris, S. (2002). Facilitating growth of administrative practitioners as mentors. Journal of Research for Educational Leaders, 1(2), 5–20. Available: www.uiowa.edu/~jrel/spring02/Harris_0107.htm
Dukess, L. (2001). Meeting the leadership challenge: Designing effective principal mentor programs. New York: New Visions for Public Schools. (ERIC Document No. ED 464 392)
Educational Research Service. (1998). Is there a shortage of qualified candidates for openings in the principalship? Alexandria, VA: National Association of Elementary School Principals (NAESP) and Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals (NASSP).
Educational Research Service. (2000). The principal, keystone of a high-achieving school. Alexandria, VA: NAESP and Reston, VA: NASSP.
Howley, A., Chadwick, K., & Howley, C. (2002). Networking for the nuts and bolts: The ironies of professional development for rural principals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document No. ED 463 908)
Lashway, L. (2003). Inducting school leaders. Eugene, OR: CEPM Clearinghouse on Educational Management. (ERIC Digest 170). Available: http://eric.uoregon.edu/publications/digests/digest170.html
Wilmore, E., McNeil, J., & Townzen, L. (1999). The evaluation of a field-based principal preparation program in Texas. (ERIC Document No. ED 432 040)
John H. Holloway is Project Director, Educational Testing Service, Rosedale Rd., Princeton, NJ 08541;
Copyright © 2004 by Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
Subscribe to ASCD Express, our twice-monthly e-mail newsletter, to have practical, actionable strategies and information delivered to your e-mail inbox twice a month.
ASCD respects intellectual property rights and adheres to the laws governing them. Learn more about our permissions policy and submit your request online.