1703 North Beauregard St. Alexandria, VA 22311-1714 Tel: 1-800-933-ASCD (2723) Fax: 703-575-5400
8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. eastern time, Monday through Friday
Local to the D.C. area: 1-703-578-9600
Toll-free from U.S. and Canada: 1-800-933-ASCD (2723)
All other countries: (International Access Code) + 1-703-578-9600
April 2014 | Volume 71 | Number 7 Writing: A Core Skill
Jihwa Noh and Karen Sabey
When students write their own math word problems, teachers get immediate feedback about which concepts they do and don't understand.
How do you go about calculating 2/3 × 1/4? You may have multiplied the two numbers on top (namely, numerators) to get 2 and multiplied the two numbers on the bottom (namely, denominators) to get 12, so you would get the answer of 2/12 (or 1/6 if simplified). Or you may have begun by simplifying the 2 in 2/3 and the 4 in 1/4 and then followed the previously described method. If you got the correct answer, congratulate yourself for remembering the procedure.
Now we have a different question for you: Can you write a word problem in which you would calculate 2/3 × 1/4 to find the answer? Hmm, do you feel like you need to brush up on your math skills? Perhaps your teachers never asked you to write a word problem when you were in school.
You can use at least four different contextual situations for your word problem, each of which embodies a different interpretation for multiplication of fractions. First, there's looking at fraction multiplication as taking a part of a part. For example, using that same problem, "There was 1/4 of a pan of brownies left from yesterday's party. If you ate 2/3 of the leftover brownies, what fractional part of the pan of brownies would you have eaten?"
Second, you might make a scale drawing in which one foot is represented by 1/4 of an inch. To determine how long a 2/3-foot-long table would be on the drawing, you'd need to multiply 2/3 × 1/4.
Third, perhaps you want to determine the probability of rain on both days when there's a 66 percent chance of rain on Saturday (approximately 2/3) and a 25 percent chance on Sunday. You'd multiply the two numbers in fraction or decimal form (2/3 × 1/4).
Finally, you might wish to find the area of a rectangular region whose dimensions are 2/3 of a yard by 1/4 of a yard. You'd do that by multiplying 2/3 × 1/4.
In our study involving 140 college freshmen, only two students were able to write a word problem that correctly represented a given fraction multiplication problem. Fifty-seven (41 percent) wrote a problem that would be answered by operations other than multiplication, such as addition. Fifty-three (38 percent) didn't even attempt to write a word problem, or their responses contained no substantial information, making them unanalyzable. Not only was the students' mathematical understanding disappointing, but there also were language issues, such as spelling, semantic, and syntactical errors, and issues using inappropriate or unrealistic contexts.
The Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers, 2010) and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000) advocate using multiple methods that give students opportunities to learn mathematical ideas and demonstrate their understandings. By having students write word problems that encompass a variety of contextual situations, teachers gain insight into how students have interpreted a mathematical idea as well as their preferences for problem-solving strategies (National Mathematics Advisory Panel, 2008; Newton, 2008).
We want our students to make sense of the mathematics they're learning and solve problems in sense-making ways, rather than merely applying rules and formulas. In our study, one of the common errors that students made concerning the multiplication of fractions was the result of a misconception—that multiplication always makes numbers bigger.
One student wrote, "Tom has 2/3 of an apple and needs to make a big batch for a recipe by 5/7. How many apples will he have now?" In addition to the readability issue this problem presents, adjusting a recipe by 5/7 would not yield a bigger batch, but rather a smaller one. Having students write word problems gives teachers immediate feedback about student misconceptions as well as the opportunity to develop lesson plans to both address student weaknesses and bolster student strengths.
When students write their own word problems, they typically make use of situations and contexts with which they're familiar. This can make the problems far more meaningful and comprehensible (Barwell, 2003; Chapman, 2006). This can be particularly helpful for English language learners (ELLs), who may find word problems difficult because they lack appropriate background knowledge, such as knowledge about U.S. currency or American football rules. By having ELLs write their own word problems using situations familiar to them, as well as language they can manage, teachers can more easily assess their mathematical abilities.
There's a prevalent myth that ELLs cannot be successful in solving word problems until they're more fluent in English (Martiniello, 2008). Because of this misunderstanding, many teachers might limit the teaching of mathematics to computation exercises instead of engaging the students in problem-solving efforts using word problems. This approach yields missed opportunities for ELLs to work toward overcoming the language demands of mathematics.
As students share their word problems with the class and invite their peers to solve those problems, they're led into discussions, both in small groups and as part of a whole-class discussion, about the meaning of their problems and how best to solve them. These discussions give students practice using mathematics language, which both the Common Core State Standards in Mathematics and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics emphasize as an essential component in learning mathematics. A problem-posing activity can bring in many forms of communication, such as writing, speaking, reading, and listening, which benefit not just ELLs but all students.
Mathematics language is semantically and syntactically specialized. Students may be familiar with the common uses of words like even, odd, and improper, but these words have a different meaning when used in mathematics. Sometimes the same mathematical word is used in more than one way within the field itself. The word square, for example, can refer to a shape and also to a number times itself (Rubenstein & Thompson, 2002). Also, mathematics language makes use of certain syntactic structures—such as greater than/less than, n times as much as, divided by as opposed to divided into, if/then, and so on (Chamot & O'Malley, 1994).
Student-written math problems help students connect the mathematics they're learning to other mathematical ideas and with ideas outside the mathematics classroom. These problems also help students understand how the theoretical language of mathematics and the everyday language of word problems are related.
When using fractions, it's important to clarify what the unit whole is. In the following example, the whole is unclear: "Bill has 2/3 of oranges left in his bag. Bill would like 5/7 more. How many oranges would Bill end up with?" It's unclear what whole is associated with the 5/7: the number of oranges that Bill currently has or the number of oranges that were in the bag originally. In either case, we can't answer the question because we don't know what the original number of oranges was. Asking "what fraction of a bag" instead of "how many oranges" would be more appropriate.
In the following example, the measurements the student used are unrealistic, although the problem is correct mathematically: "Jamie made a pan of brownies. The pan's length was 2/3cm and its width was 5/7cm. How big is the pan?" In addition, the word big is ambiguous because it could mean either the area or perimeter of the pan.
Also, a number of students merely translated the multiplication sign into words. For example, "Ben has 2/3 of his candy bar left, and Sally has 5/7 of her candy bar left. If you multiply their candy bars together, how much would they have?" But what does multiplying two candy bars really mean?
Teachers need to find ways of helping students overcome the difficulties they encounter in writing word problems. Let's say you ask students to write a word problem in which they need to do the calculation from the opening of this article—2/3 × 1/4—to find the answer. A student may respond with the following: Julie ate 1/4 of a pizza. Janet ate 2/3 more. How much pizza did Janet eat?
The first problem we encounter is with the words "2/3 more." Is this (a) 2/3 of a whole pizza, or is this (b) 2/3 of what Julie ate? If the meaning is (a), then the answer to the problem—How much pizza did Janet eat?—is 1/4 + 2/3, or 11/12 of a pizza. If the meaning is (b), then the answer is 1/4 + 2/3(1/4), or 5/12 of a pizza. Neither of these interpretations uses 2/3 × 1/4 to calculate the answer.
To help students gain conceptual understanding of the word problem in question, teachers can provide a visual representation. To illustrate the problem in a way that requires a calculation of 2/3 × 1/4, you'll need to start by restating the problem correctly: Julie ate 1/4 of a pizza. Janet ate 2/3 as much pizza as Julie did. How much pizza did Janet eat?
Draw a picture of a circle (pizza) cut into 4 equal pieces; one shaded piece represents the 1/4 pizza that Julie ate. Then divide that 1/4 into 3 equal pieces (each piece now represents 1/3 of 1/4, which is 1/12). Shading two of those pieces gives the answer of 2/12 (or simplified, 1/6), which is the correct answer to 2/3 × 1/4. Illustrating the problem with an image like this one can increase students' ability to write meaningful word problems.
Here are some things that teachers can do to help students write good word problems:
Under the new Common Core standards, mathematics instruction emphasizes conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, multiple approaches to and models of mathematical problems, and problems requiring analysis and explanation. Having students write, solve, and talk about their own word problems is an enjoyable way to integrate communication skills, including writing, into instruction while deepening students' mathematical knowledge.
Barwell, R. (2003). Working on word problems. Mathematics Teaching, 185, 6–8.
Chamot, A., & O'Malley, J. M. (1994). CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach. MA: Addison-Wesley.
Chapman, O. (2006). Classroom practices for context of mathematics word problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62, 211–230.
Martiniello, M. (2008). Language and the performance of ELLs in math word problems. Harvard Educational Review, 78(2), 333–368.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Washington DC: Author.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/report/final-report.pdf
Newton, K. J. (2008). An extensive analysis of pre-service elementary teachers' knowledge of fractions. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 1080–1110.
Rubenstein, R. N., & Thompson, D. R. (2002). Understanding and supporting children's mathematical vocabulary development. Teaching Children Mathematics, 9(2), 107–112.
Jihwa Noh is associate professor and Karen Sabey is assistant professor in the Department of Mathematics, University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls.
Subscribe to ASCD Express, our free e-mail newsletter, to have practical, actionable strategies and information delivered to your e-mail inbox twice a month.
ASCD respects intellectual property rights and adheres to the laws governing them. Learn more about our permissions policy and submit your request online.