1703 North Beauregard St.
Alexandria, VA 22311-1714
Tel: 1-800-933-ASCD (2723)
8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. eastern time, Monday through Friday
Local to the D.C. area: 1-703-578-9600
Toll-free from U.S. and Canada: 1-800-933-ASCD (2723)
All other countries: (International Access Code) + 1-703-578-9600
December 1996/January 1997 | Volume 54 | Number 4
Teaching for Authentic Student Performance
Authentic assessments tend to use rubrics to describe student achievement. At last, here's clarity on the term.
Every time I introduce rubrics to a group of teachers, the reaction is the same instant appeal ("Yes, this is what I need!") followed closely by panic ("Good grief, how can I be expected to develop a rubric for everything?"). When you learn what rubrics do and why you can create and use them to support and assess student learning without losing your sanity.
A rubric is a scoring tool that lists the criteria for a piece of work, or "what counts" (for example, purpose, organization, details, voice, and mechanics are often what count in a piece of writing); it also articulates gradations of quality for each criterion, from excellent to poor. The term defies a dictionary definition, but it seems to have established itself, so I continue to use it.
The example in Figure 1 (adapted from Perkins et al. 1994) lists the criteria and gradations of quality for verbal, written, or graphic reports on student inventions for instance, inventions designed to ease the Westward journey for 19th century pioneers, or to solve a local environmental problem, or to represent an imaginary culture and its inhabitants, or anything else students might invent.
The report explains the key purposes of the invention and points out less obvious ones as well.
The report explains all the key purposes of the invention.
The report explains some of the purposes of the invention but misses key purposes.
The report does not refer to the purposes of the invention.
The report details both key and hidden features of the invention and explains how they serve several purposes.
The report details the key features of the invention and explains the purposes they serve.
The report neglects some features of the invention or the purposes they serve.
The report does not detail the features of the invention or the purposes they serve.
The report discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the invention and suggests ways in which it can be improved.
The report discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the invention.
The report discusses either the strengths or weaknesses of the invention but not both.
The report does not mention the strengths or the weaknesses of the invention.
The report makes appropriate connections between the purposes and features of the invention and many different kinds of phenomena.
The report makes appropriate connections between the purposes and features of the invention and one or two phenomena.
The report makes unclear or inappropriate connections between the invention and other phenomena.
The report makes no connections between the invention and other things.
This rubric lists the criteria in the column on the left: The report must explain (1) the purposes of the invention, (2) the features or parts of the invention and how they help it serve its purposes, (3) the pros and cons of the design, and (4) how the design connects to other things past, present, and future. The rubric could easily include criteria related to presentation style and effectiveness, the mechanics of written pieces, and the quality of the invention itself.
The four columns to the right of the criteria describe varying degrees of quality, from excellent to poor. As concisely as possible, these columns explain what makes a good piece of work good and a bad one bad.
Rubrics appeal to teachers and students for many reasons. First, they are powerful tools for both teaching and assessment. Rubrics can improve student performance, as well as monitor it, by making teachers' expectations clear and by showing students how to meet these expectations. The result is often marked improvements in the quality of student work and in learning. Thus, the most common argument for using rubrics is that they help define "quality." One student actually didn't like rubrics for this very reason: "If you get something wrong," she said, "your teacher can prove you knew what you were supposed to do!" (Marcus 1995).
A second reason that rubrics are useful is that they help students become more thoughtful judges of the quality of their own and others' work. When rubrics are used to guide self- and peer assessment, students become increasingly able to spot and solve problems in their own and one another's work. Repeated practice with peer assessment, and especially self-assessment, increases students' sense of responsibility for their own work and cuts down on the number of "Am I done yet?" questions.
Third, rubrics reduce the amount of time teachers spend evaluating student work. Teachers tend to find that by the time a piece has been self- and peer-assessed according to a rubric, they have little left to say about it. When they do have something to say, they can often simply circle an item in the rubric, rather than struggling to explain the flaw or strength they have noticed and figuring out what to suggest in terms of improvements. Rubrics provide students with more informative feedback about their strengths and areas in need of improvement.
Fourth, teachers appreciate rubrics because their "accordion" nature allows them to accommodate heterogeneous classes. The examples here have three or four gradations of quality, but there is no reason they can't be "stretched" to reflect the work of both gifted students and those with learning disabilities.
Finally, rubrics are easy to use and explain. Christine Hall, a 4th grade teacher, reflected on how both students and parents responded to her use of rubrics:
Students were able to articulate what they had learned, and by the end of the year could be accurate with their evaluations. Parents were very excited about the use of rubrics. During parent conferences, I used sample rubrics to explain to parents their purpose, and how they were used in class. The reaction of parents was very encouraging. They knew exactly what their child needed to do to be successful.
Rubrics are becoming increasingly popular with educators moving toward more authentic, performance-based assessments. Recent publications contain some rubrics (Brewer 1996; Marzano et al. 1993). Chances are, however, that you will have to develop a few to reflect your own curriculum and teaching style. To boost the learning leverage of rubrics, the rubric design process should engage students in the following steps:
Step 1 may be necessary only when you are asking students to engage in a task with which they are unfamiliar. Steps 3 and 4 are useful but time-consuming; you can do these on your own, especially when you've been using rubrics for a while. A class experienced in rubric-based assessment can streamline the process so that it begins with listing criteria, after which the teacher writes out the gradations of quality, checks them with the students, makes revisions, then uses the rubric for self-, peer-, and teacher assessment.
Ann Tanona, a 2nd grade teacher, went through the seven step process with her students. The result was a rubric for assessing videotaped Reading Rainbow-style "book talks" (fig. 2).
Did I get my audience's attention?
Did I tell what kind of book?
Tells exactly what type of book it is
Not sure, not clear
Didn't mention it
Did I tell something about the main character?
Included facts about character
Slid over character
Did not tell anything about main character
Did I mention the setting?
Tells when and where story takes place
Didn't mention setting
Did I tell one interesting part?
Made it sound interesting—I want to buy it!
Told part and skipped on to something else
Forgot to do it
Did I tell who might like the book?
Skipped over it
Forgot to tell
How did I look?
Hair combed, neat, clean clothes, smiled, looked up, happy
Just-got-out-of-bed look, head down
How did I sound?
Clear, strong, cheerful voice
No expression in voice
Difficult to understand—6-inch voice or screeching
Ann's rubric is powerful because it articulates the characteristics of a good "book talk" in students' own words. It also demonstrates some of the difficulties of designing a good rubric.
Perhaps the most common challenge is avoiding unclear language, such as "creative beginning." If a rubric is to teach as well as evaluate, terms like these must be defined for students. Admittedly, creative is a difficult word to define. Ann handled this problem by having a discussion of what the term "creative beginning" meant in book talks. Patricia Crosby and Pamela Heinz, both 7th grade teachers, solved the same problem in a rubric for oral presentations by actually listing ways in which students could meet the criterion (fig. 3). This approach provides valuable information to students on how to begin a talk and avoids the need to define elusive terms like creative.
Gains attention of audience
Gives details or an amusing fact, a series of questions, a short demonstration, a colorful visual, or a personal reason why they picked this topic.
Does a two-sentence introduction, then starts speech. Gives a one-sentence introduction, then starts speech.
Does not attempt to gain attention of audience, just starts speech.
A second challenge in rubric design is avoiding unnecessarily negative language. The excerpt from the rubric in Figure 3 avoids words like boring by describing what was done during a so-so beginning of a talk and implicitly comparing it with the highest level of quality. Thus, students know exactly what they did wrong and how they can do better next time, not just that the opening to their talk was boring.
Articulating gradations of quality is often a challenge. It helps if you spend a lot of time thinking about criteria and how best to chunk them before going on to define the levels of quality. You might also try a clever technique I borrowed from a 5th grade teacher in Gloucester, Massachusetts. She describes gradations of quality as "Yes," "Yes but," "No but," and "No." For example, Figure 4 shows part of a rubric for evaluating a scrapbook that documents a story. This approach tends to work well, as long as you aren't too rigid about it. Rigidity can have amusing results: One student wrote out the lowest level of quality for the criterion, "Is it anachronism free?" this way: "No, I did not remember to not use anachronism"!
Gives enough details
Yes, I put in enough details to give the reader a sense of time, place, and events.
Yes, I put in some details, but some key details are missing.
No, I didn't put in enough details, but I did include a few.
No, I had almost no details.
Creating rubrics is the hard part using them is relatively easy. Once you've created a rubric, give copies to students and ask them to assess their own progress on a task or project. Their assessments should not count toward a grade. The point is for the rubric to help students learn more and produce better final products, so including self-assessments in grades is unnecessary and can compromise students' honesty.
Always give students time to revise their work after assessing themselves, and then have them assess one another's work. Peer assessment takes some getting used to. Emphasize the fact that peer assessment, like self-assessment, is intended to help everyone do better work. You may need to hold students accountable for their assessments of a classmate's work by having them sign off on the rubric they use. You can then see how fair and accurate their feedback is, and you can ask for evidence that supports their opinions when their assessments don't match yours. Again, giving time for revision after peer assessment is crucial.
Parents can use rubrics to help their children with their homework. Finally, when you assess student work, use the same rubric that was used for self- and peer assessment. When you hand the marked rubric back with the students' work, they'll know what they did well and what they need to work on in the future.
Grading (if you must) is also relatively easy with rubrics. A piece of work that reflects the highest level of quality for each criterion obviously deserves an A, one that consistently falls in the lowest level deserves a D or F, and so on. Because one piece of work rarely falls in only one level of quality, many teachers average out the levels of quality, either formally or informally.
Rubrics can also be included in portfolios. However you use them, the idea is to support and evaluate student learning. Students, as well as teachers, should respond to the use of rubrics by thinking, "Yes, this is what I need!"
Brewer, R. (1996). Exemplars: A Teacher's Solution. Underhill, Vt.: Exemplars.
Marcus, J. (1995). "Data on the Impact of Alternative Assessment on Students." Unpublished manuscript. The Education Cooperative Wellesley, Mass.
Marzano, R., D. Pickering, and J. McTighe (1993). Assessing Student Outcomes: Performance Assessment Using the Dimensions of Learning Model. Alexandria, Va.: ASCD.
Perkins, D., H. Goodrich, S. Tishman, and J. Mirman Owen. (1994). Thinking Connections: Learning to Think and Thinking to Learn. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
Heidi Goodrich is a Research Associate at the Harvard Graduate School of Education, Longfellow Hall Project Zero, Cambridge, MA 02138 (e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org).
Copyright © 1996 by Heidi Goodrich
Subscribe to ASCD Express, our free e-mail newsletter, to have practical, actionable strategies and information delivered to your e-mail inbox twice a month.
ASCD respects intellectual property rights and adheres to the laws governing them. Learn more about our permissions policy and submit your request online.