1703 North Beauregard St.
Alexandria, VA 22311-1714
Tel: 1-800-933-ASCD (2723)
8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. eastern time, Monday through Friday
Local to the D.C. area: 1-703-578-9600
Toll-free from U.S. and Canada: 1-800-933-ASCD (2723)
All other countries: (International Access Code) + 1-703-578-9600
February 2017 | Volume 74 | Number 5
Literacy in Every Classroom
Let's teach this currency of the information age explicitly.
In the run-up to the 2016 presidential election, Facebook and other social media sites were abuzz with stories about Pope Francis endorsing Donald Trump, ISIS leaders calling for American Muslims to vote for Hillary Clinton, and Mike Pence labelling Michelle Obama vulgar. There was just one problem: The stories were all untrue.
Yet according to an analysis by BuzzFeed (Silverman, 2016), these and other "fake news" stories received hundreds of thousands of engagements and reposts on Facebook—outstripping news from traditional media outlets like CNN and touching off a firestorm of criticism of Facebook.
Amid our furor over fake news sites, we might ask a larger question: How could people be so easily duped? After all, many fake news stories are patently absurd or easily fact checked. That question might lead to another: How can we help our students, who are increasingly bombarded with information of varying reliability, read not just with comprehension, but also with discernment—in short, by applying critical thinking?
Let's start by acknowledging that critical thinking—or the lack of it—isn't a new concern. More than 70 years ago, Edward Glaser, an early leader in critical-thinking research, lamented that although public education in the United States had created a "literate electorate," "a sufficient proportion of citizens" still couldn't "evaluate critically what they read" (Glaser, 1941, p. 4–5).
What might be different today is that critical thinking seems to be the sina qua non of the information age. The number of job postings referencing "critical thinking" doubled between 2009 and 2014 (Korn, 2014). A recent analysis of postgraduation outcomes for nearly 1,000 college graduates found that those with better critical thinking abilities landed better jobs (Zahner & James, 2015). In a recent survey, 80 percent of Americans put critical thinking skills at the top of the list of what schools should teach (Lopez & Calderon, 2013).
But what exactly is critical thinking? Researchers see it as a complex mix of dispositions and skills, including valuing inquisitiveness and alternative points of view, using logical reasoning to create and support arguments, and examining our own beliefs and being able to change them in light of new, compelling data (Abrami, et al., 2015). Critical thinking is often closely interwoven with domain-specific knowledge. As a result, it isn't a skill in the usual sense of the word—something learned and easily transferred to new contexts. Rather, critical thinkers employ the principles of scientific thinking with science knowledge, textual analysis with literature, quantitative reasoning with mathematics, and so on.
This complexity may explain why even colleges—where we'd expect students to sharpen their thinking abilities—often do little to develop critical thinking. A recent analysis of 2,300 undergraduates at 24 institutions found that 45 percent of these students demonstrated no significant gains in critical thinking, complex reasoning, and writing during their first two years of college (Arum & Roksa, 2011). A study of 32,000 college students arrived at a similar finding: Fully 40 percent of students demonstrated only basic or below-basic levels of critical thinking (Belkin, 2015).
Nonetheless, research has shown that it's possible to help students develop critical thinking. Two big ideas emerge from these studies:
These two ideas suggest that the best approach to helping students develop critical thinking is through explicit instruction—not as a standalone endeavor, but within respective fields of knowledge. Silver, Perini, and Boutz (2016) suggest one starting point for building critical thinking: Ask students to support every answer they give with the word because ("I know this is the best interpretation/most plausible explanation/strongest argument because …"). It's a simple, powerful word—a concentrated drop of critical thinking. Asking students to pause and ponder before they accept (and share) information may be the best deterrent to "fake news" we can offer.
Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Waddington, D. I., Wade, C. A., & Persson, T. (2015). Strategies for teaching students to think critically: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 85(2), 275–314.
Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Retrieved from http://highered.ssrc.org/publications/academically-adrift/
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., & Bankert, E. (1990, April). Meta-analysis of effects of explicit instruction for critical thinking. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, MA.
Belkin, D. (2015, January 16). Test finds college graduates lack skills for white-collar jobs. Retrieved from Wall Street Journal.
Glaser, E. M. (1941). An experiment in the development of critical thinking. New York: Bureau of Publication, Teacher's College, Columbia University.
Korn, M. (2014, October 21). Bosses seek "critical thinking," but what is that? Retrieved from Wall Street Journal.
Lopez, S. J., & Calderon, V. J., (2013). Americans say U.S. schools should teach "soft" skills. Retrieved from www.gallup.com/poll/164060/americans-say-schools-teach-soft-skills.aspx
Marin, L. M., & Halpern, D. F. (2011). Pedagogy for developing critical thinking in adolescents: Explicit instruction produces greatest gains. Thinking skills and creativity, 6, 1–13.
Pellegrino, A. M. (2007). The manifestation of critical thinking and metacognition in secondary American history students through the implementation of lesson plans and activities consistent with historical thinking skills (Doctoral dissertation).
Silver, H. F., Perini, M. J., & Boutz, A. L. (2016). Tools for a successful school year. Franklin Lakes, NJ: Thoughtful Education Press.
Silverman, C. (2016, November 16). This analysis shows how fake election news stories outperformed real news on Facebook. Retrieved from BuzzFeed News.
Zahner, D., & James, J. K. (2015). Predictive validity of a critical thinking assessment for post-college outcomes. New York: Council for Aid to Education.
Bryan Goodwin is president and CEO of McREL International, Denver, Colorado, and lead author of Balanced Leadership for Powerful Learning (ASCD, 2015).
Copyright © 2017 by ASCD
Subscribe to ASCD Express, our free e-mail newsletter, to have practical, actionable strategies and information delivered to your e-mail inbox twice a month.
ASCD respects intellectual property rights and adheres to the laws governing them. Learn more about our permissions policy and submit your request online.