Phone Monday through Friday 8:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m.
1-800-933-ASCD (2723)
Address 1703 North Beauregard St. Alexandria, VA 22311-1714
Complete Customer Service Details
November 1999 | Volume 57 | Number 3 The Constructivist Classroom Pages 25-28
Margaret G. McKeown and Isabel L. Beck
Although constructivism sounds deceptively simple in theory, many teachers encounter obstacles in creating constructivist classrooms. This constructivist approach to teaching literature gets students to do the talking and the thinking.
The notion of a constructivist classroom derives from the strongest instructional implication of what has been called the cognitive revolution (Gardner, 1985). That is, for effective learning to occur, students must construct their own knowledge and teachers must orient their instructional practices toward teaching for understanding. Instead of transmitting knowledge to students, the teacher becomes their guide and helper, assisting students to make their own connections. But as Courtney Cazden (1988) says about such visions, "It is easy to imagine [classrooms] in which ideas are explored rather than answers to teachers' test questions provided and evaluated. . . . Easy to imagine, but not easy to do" (p. 54).
Even teachers who examine their practice and shift toward a constructivist orientation encounter many obstacles along the way. Creating an environment in which students build their own knowledge is a much harder task than just asking questions and fielding answers. In fact, after hearing the variety and unpredictability of students' responses and needs in the classroom, we amended our notion of teachers as symphony conductors (Shulman, 1987) to one of teachers as air traffic controllers.
Join the education organization for all educators.
Get full access, plus expert resources and solutions to support whole child education.
Subscribe to Educational Leadership magazine and save up to 51% OFF the cover price.
Explore timely content from ASCD.