September 2012
| Volume 70 | Number 1
Feedback for Learning
Marge Scherer
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Grant Wiggins
Students may feel that they receive feedback throughout the school day: "You need more examples in your report." "I'm so pleased by your
poster." "This paper is not your best work—you earned a C." "Great job!" But such comments—in which
teachers offer advice, praise, criticism, or evaluation—don't provide the kind of descriptive feedback that can help students improve their performance, writes Grant
Wiggins
in this article.
Feedback, says Wiggins, is "information about how we are doing in our efforts to reach a goal." Helpful feedback is always goal-referenced: The performer has a clear goal, and the feedback tells whether he or she is on track or needs to make adjustments. Helpful feedback is also tangible, actionable, user-friendly, timely, ongoing, and consistent. Fortunately, the teacher is not the only possible source of effective feedback—peers, other teachers, technology, and instruction that
builds
in intrinsic feedback are equally powerful. But it's essential to provide as much descriptive feedback as possible, says Wiggins, because "the research shows that
less teaching plus more feedback is the key to achieving greater learning."
Part of an issue on "Feedback for Learning."
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
John Hattie
"There is as much effective as ineffective feedback," writes noted researcher John Hattie. This seemingly innocent statement immediately translates into
another: Teachers are giving a lot of feedback out there, and not all of it is good! So how can educators tell the difference between effective and noneffective feedback? How can they
use feedback to more accurately assess the effect of their teaching? Hattie shows readers how to become "adaptive experts" who investigate and diagnose student
responses. He shares insights about providing the right level of feedback relative to the proficiency level of the learner. And he cautions us about the dual dangers of praise and peer
feedback as he steers us in the direction of what really works.
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Susan M. Brookhart
"Feedback without a learning target is just somebody telling you what to do," notes feedback guru Susan Brookhart. So what's a teacher to do? Set
the feedback in context, advises the author. This means paying attention to what happens beforehand—that's establishing a learning target so students have a
reference
point for using the feedback they receive—and to what happens afterward—that's giving students the opportunity to digest, understand, and use the feedback.
See what
feedback looks like when it fizzles—and when it sparkles. And see what breaks the author's heart about the feedback that so many well-intentioned teachers give to
their
students. Three trusty tips will put you on the path to providing great feedback.
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Dylan Wiliam
In engineering, feedback is part of a system, and its role is to keep the system working. For example, consider the domestic room thermostat. Feedback that the current
temperature is lower than the desired setting automatically triggers a response—turning on the heating system. Without the response, the feedback serves no purpose.
In education, it's equally important—but unfortunately more complicated—to elicit a desirable response to feedback, writes Dylan Wiliam in this article. The
research
on feedback, including an analysis of all well-designed studies from 1905 to 1995, has found mixed results—most likely because much of this research has not recognized
the
importance of recipient response. Students respond differently to feedback depending on many factors, including their beliefs about intelligence, their experiences with other
teachers, their attitudes about the subject matter, and their relationship with the teacher. That's why teachers who use feedback to maximum effect must get to know their
students well and establish a classroom environment in which all students feel safe making mistakes and believe they can improve with effort. Wiliam makes several
recommendations for establishing such an environment.
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Jan Chappuis
When Jan Chappuis's daughter Claire brought home a math paper with a -3, a smiley face, and an M at the top, Chappuis asked her what
she thought the marks meant she knew. Claire looked puzzled and said "Math." When asked what she thought she needed to learn, she looked more puzzled and
said, "Math?" Because the marks on the paper did not tell Claire what she's good at or what she needs to keep working on, her paper did not function as
effective feedback. In this article, Chappuis describes five characteristics of effective feedback:
It points out strengths in the work and offers specific information to guide improvement.
It occurs during the learning, while there is still time for the student to act on it.
It addresses partial understanding. If a student's work doesn't demonstrate a partial understanding, then reteaching, rather than feedback, is
needed.
Effective feedback does not do the thinking for the student. For example, feedback on a writing assignment might not correct errors but simply indicate where the errors
are.
Effective feedback limits corrective information to an amount the student can act on.
For feedback to be effective, students must act on it, and they're more likely to act on feedback when their teachers look closely at their work to understand what they
understand and identify where they need help. Such feedback communicates to students that their teachers are listening to them, which increases the likelihood that students will
trust their teachers enough to follow their advice.
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Douglas Fisher and Nancy Frey
Teachers know that giving students effective, ongoing feedback is crucial—but where can they find the time? And even when they do find it, how likely is the student to
actually
read and absorb the comments? There must be a better way—and authors Fisher and Frey have found it. They suggest several time-saving ways of approaching the feedback
problem. Some rules of thumb? Don't mark every mistake a student makes; concentrate on errors instead. Rather than waste all that time catching isolated errors, look for
patterns because this will show you what you need to reteach—and to whom. Finally, guide students' thinking so they take responsibility for their learning. If they learn
how
to think about their mistakes and errors, they won't take the easy way out and just look to you for the "right" information.
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Cris Tovani
Cris Tovani, a high school language arts teacher, used to spend a lot of time trying to provide the perfect feedback to inspire her students' learning. In this article,
Tovani tells what happened when she realized that the feedback students give can be just as powerful as the feedback they get. Gathering feedback from students—through such strategies as individual conferences, student response forms, small-group discussions, and exit
cards—is now an integral part of Tovani's instructional cycle. When you don't know how to help a student, she advises, it's surprisingly effective to simply ask,
"What do you need?"
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Maja Wilson
A young child stands in front of you, paper held out, demanding, "Look at My Drawing!" Many teachers and parents treasure this moment because it makes
them feel needed and because the child and the drawing are so cute. But the way we respond to this moment can tell us a lot about the power and purpose of feedback, writes Maja
Wilson in this article.
Wilson provides two extended examples of feedback: a dialogue she had with Noah, a 4-year-old student who sought feedback on his drawing of a porcupine; and the
commentary provided by educator Peter Elbow on a college student's writing assignment. By deeply reflecting on these examples, Wilson demonstrates how feedback can
go beyond praise or criticism. What students seek from feedback, she asserts, is engagement with other people and with the work they are doing. The best feedback therefore has
three goals—to improve the student's product; to support the student's healthy view of himself or herself as an active learner; and to help the student learn what
it
means to be an artist, a writer, a scientist, a historian—in short, a learner and creator in any field.
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
William Himmele and Pérsida Himmele
Here's a scene familiar to all of us: The teacher starts out a lesson with the traditional question-and-answer session. He or she asks a question directed at the entire
class, waits for hands to go up, and then selects one of the few hands raised. But what about the other students? Are they with us—and how do we know? According to the
authors,
if we start out like this, we're doing things backward. They suggest, instead, several techniques that engage all students with the content
and, at the same time, promote higher-order thinking. See what the chalkboard splash, the debate team carousel, and picture notes look like in practice. These techniques are
particularly successful with students who struggle to articulate what they know, such as shy students, English language learners, students receiving learning support, and
unmotivated or disengaged students.
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Peter Johnston
"What's this draft about?" may not seem like encouraging feedback to a young writer. But a pointed question like this, Peter Johnston maintains, can
direct a writer to think more deeply about what he or she is aiming to say. Johnston notes that the traditional concept of feedback as telling students what's good or bad
about their writing—or their performance in math, science, or other fields—is unhelpful. Instead, we should deliver feedback as questions, as neutral observations of
accomplishment
("You gave five complete examples"), or as whole-class conversation about the choices various writers make. To give feedback that strengthens learners'
motivation and persistence, teachers should keep five principles in mind: A learning context in which students are truly engaged makes feedback more palatable; fostering peer
feedback is important; good feedback focuses on the processes a learner used; praise isn't the best way to give a positive message; and
feedback focused on judging the learner (even positively) can backfire.
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Gregory Kaster
If a business wants to improve, the business owners know they need to ask the customers what's working and what isn't. In the case of schools, who has a
better understanding of what works and what doesn't in a school than the schools' "customers"—the students? Gregory Kaster, principal of
Madison Elementary School in Marshfield, Wisconsin, regularly asks students how the school could improve. Students share ideas in monthly small-group meetings, regular
whole-class discussions, and exit interviews as they prepare to leave middle school?
Students' ideas have often focused on logistical issues, such as congestion in the lunchroom and the school parking lot. They have also been passionate about
misbehavior in the bathrooms, a subject they kept returning to even when Kaster tried to steer the conversation to bigger issues, such as bullying. Suggestions for improving
instruction have included offering more project-based learning and using more technology. Students helped school leaders prepare for standardized testing by offering input on how
they could be grouped on test day and on what kinds of incentives would encourage them to do their best. Despite some teachers' concerns that students would use such
opportunities as exit interviews to vent about teachers they disliked, Kaster has found that students are respectful and honored to get the chance to share their views. And their
ideas have helped make Madison a more student-friendly place.
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
T. Philip Nichols
In 1964, ELIZA, a computer developed by Joseph Weizenbaum as an experiment in artificial intelligence, listened to people's stories and responded in such human
ways that people seemed to forget the machine couldn't really understand them. According to T. Philip Nichols, the ELIZA project illustrates how easy it is to conflate
technical feedback with meaningful response. Technology has enabled schools to make feedback quantifiable, systematic, and scalable. But at what cost?
In the name of efficiency, schools are increasingly reliant on quantifiable measures as a primary avenue for feedback. But such measures lead students and parents to focus
more on numerical scores than on what students have learned. So how can teachers reorient their classrooms to focus on learning and growth? Nichols offers three
suggestions:
Make time for meaningful discussions about student work.
Value qualitative behaviors over quantitative scores.
Acknowledge student growth over time.
Although teachers cannot change the system overnight, Nichols believes it is possible and important to create space for nuanced human responses in classrooms.
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Angela Di Michele Lalor
Wouldn't you turn off a global positioning system that gave you directions for getting somewhere other than your desired destination? So, Lalor argues, would a student
whose teacher gave him or her feedback that was unrelated to that student's learning goal. Just as a working GPS tells a driver precisely where he or she is on a trip toward
a specific place, a teacher delivering feedback should tell a student precisely where he or she is in relation to mastering a specific learning goal. Good feedback lets a student know
what he's done right so far—and when he has stalled or taken a wrong turn or and needs to head in a different direction. Using extended examples from different grade
levels, Lalor advises teachers to use a three-part protocol to give feedback on student work: (1) emphasize the strengths in the work; (2) discuss questions or problems about the
work in relation to the specific assignment; and (3) suggest "next steps" for improving the work.
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Robert J. Marzano
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Bryan Goodwin and Kirsten Miller
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Doug Johnson
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Thomas R. Hoerr
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Carol Ann Tomlinson
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Jane E. Pollock
Walk into any classroom and within 10 minutes, you'll notice some students disengage, even openly laying their heads on their desks. Like a canary in a coal mine,
these "telltale" students signal that classroom instruction isn't capturing their attention. One way teachers can re-engage telltale students is by setting up
classroom routines that help such students regularly seek feedback about their own learning progress—from a source other than the classroom teacher. Pollock describes
three
techniques she's helped teachers put in place to boost student engagement through seeking feedback (including from peers and from themselves): (1) Goal accounting
templates that students fill out at the start of class; (2) an interactive notebook in which students process their questions and thoughts about material the teacher presents as they
take notes; and (3) a teacher scoring roster that gives teachers a quick read of how well each student knows the content.
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Julia H. Dermody
Jose easily memorized the multiplication tables for the lower numbers, and teachers often told Jose—an English language learner—that he was
"smart." So
why was he stuck on mastering the 5s tables? Dermody, Jose's teacher, realized that Jose's problem was his attitude about effort.
Because the lower math facts came to him easily, he believed the higher ones should also, with no need for studying on his part. Dermody discusses how essential it is for
students—especially English language learners—to develop a growth mindset, a belief that their intelligence is malleable and they can
achieve more if
they expend more effort. Too many at-risk students hold a fixed mindset, a belief that they are born with just so much brainpower and can't
learn more by trying harder. She describes how giving her elementary age ELL students growth mindset feedback—feedback that contributes to
their
sense of themselves as learners who can boost their achievement by trying their hardest, increased her students' confidence and achievement.
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Teresa Preston
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Table of Contents
Buy the Article
Copyright © 2012 by ASCD