Countdown to Annual Conference
San Antonio, Tex.
March 6-8, 2010
Home
MISSION: ASCD (formerly the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development) is a membership organization that develops programs, products, and services essential to the way educators learn, teach, and lead.
We are here to help!
1703 North Beauregard St.
Alexandria, VA 22311-1714

Tel: 1-800-933-ASCD (2723)
Fax: 1-703-575-5400

8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. EST Monday through Friday

Local to the D.C. area:
703-578-9600, press 1

Toll-free from the U.S. and Canada: 1-800-933-ASCD (2723), press 1

All other countries (International Access Code): +1-703-578-9600, press 1
Permissions and Translations
ASCD recognizes and respects intellectual property rights and adheres to copyright law. Learn about our rights and permissions policies.



November 2009

November 2009 | Volume 51 | Number 11
Making Teacher Evaluations Meaningful   

Teacher Evaluation Plan Prompts Debate in South Korea

Matthew Swift


The debate over teacher evaluations is heating up in South Korea as the government seeks support for a performance-based evaluation plan. Under the proposed plan, teachers ranked in the bottom 0.1 percent will be forced to undergo special training. If they remain in that group for three years, they will be fired. Educators in the top 0.1 percent will be rewarded with incentives. According to a 2009 Korea.net article, 1,570 schools currently have the teacher evaluation system in place as part of a pilot test being conducted by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology. A 2009 Korea Times article explains that the purpose of the evaluations is to rid the education system of poor teachers while rewarding good teachers for their performance.

This proposal is popular among parents, who overwhelmingly supported the idea in a 2007 poll. The government-sponsored poll concluded that nearly 80 percent of parents want to see some sort of teacher evaluations. Of the respondents, 30.3 percent said the system is "greatly needed," and a little more than half said it was needed on some level, Korea Beat reports in a 2007 blog post. Sixty percent of teachers also look at an evaluation system favorably, according to a 2009 Korea Times editorial.

While parents and, to a lesser degree, educators are for the evaluations, it may be surprising that the Korean Federation of Teachers' Associations (KFTA) said they would accept the system with no preconditions. The KFTA, which represents 45 percent of teachers in South Korea, initially had reservations regarding the system, but it now supports the idea.

"Teachers have become a target of public criticism since we opposed the introduction of the program," KFTA President Lee Won-hee told The Korea Times. "If it's apparently helpful in upgrading teachers' capabilities, we have no reason to oppose it."

While the KFTA has had a change of heart, not all unions are convinced the system will be effective. The Korea Teachers and Education Workers Union (KTU), a smaller union representing 15 percent of educators, is heavily critical of the plan. "The government has not made objective criteria for the evaluation," KTU spokesperson Eum Min-yong told The Korea Times. "It's to kick progressive teachers off campus."

Despite the controversy and opposition, the ministry hopes for the system to be fully implemented by 2010.




Copyright © 2009 by Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development

MEMBER SIGN IN
Username or Customer ID
Password