Countdown to Annual Conference
San Antonio, Tex.
March 6-8, 2010
Home
MISSION: ASCD (formerly the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development) is a membership organization that develops programs, products, and services essential to the way educators learn, teach, and lead.
We are here to help!
1703 North Beauregard St.
Alexandria, VA 22311-1714

Tel: 1-800-933-ASCD (2723)
Fax: 1-703-575-5400

8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. EST Monday through Friday

Local to the D.C. area:
703-578-9600, press 1

Toll-free from the U.S. and Canada: 1-800-933-ASCD (2723), press 1

All other countries (International Access Code): +1-703-578-9600, press 1
Permissions and Translations
ASCD recognizes and respects intellectual property rights and adheres to copyright law. Learn about our rights and permissions policies.




Checking for Understanding

by Douglas Fisher and Nancy Frey

Table of Contents




An ASCD Study Guide for Checking for Understanding: Formative Assessment Techniques for Your Classroom

This ASCD Study Guide is designed to enhance your understanding and application of the information contained in Checking for Understanding, an ASCD book written by Doug Fisher and Nancy Frey and published in September 2007.

You can use the study guide before or after you have read the book, or as you finish each chapter. The study questions provided are not meant to cover all aspects of the book, but, rather, to address specific ideas that might warrant further reflection.

Most of the questions contained in this study guide are ones you can think about on your own, but you might consider pairing with a colleague or forming a study group with others who have read (or are reading) Checking for Understanding.

Chapter 1: Why Check for Understanding?

  1. What are common ways that teachers check for understanding? Identify some approaches that are effective and some that are not effective. What differentiates an approach as effective or not?
  2. Discuss the differences between formative and summative assessments. When is each appropriate for use in the classroom?
  3. Discuss the relationship between checking for understanding and understanding by design. How do these two ideas compliment each other?
  4. Discuss the relationship between checking for understanding and differentiating instruction. How do these two ideas compliment each other?
  5. Discuss the relationship between checking for understanding and the goals for closing the achievement gap. How do these two ideas compliment each other?
  6. In their book Breakthrough, Fullan, Hill, and Crévola (2006) suggest that we need more precision teaching and less prescriptive teaching. What does this mean? Do you agree?

Chapter 2. Using Oral Language to Check for Understanding

  1. What is oral language?
  2. Why would an understanding of oral language development help teachers check for understanding?
  3. Discuss the misuses of oral language in the classroom.
  4. As you read the chapter, update the strategy grid (below) by adding a description of the strategy in your own words and ways in which you can use this strategy to check for understanding. Share your ideas with others who use the same strategy.


    Strategy 

    Description 

    How I can use it ... 

    Accountable Talk 

     

     

    Noticing Nonverbal Clues 

     

     

    Value Lineups 

     

     

    Retellings 

     

     

    Think-Pair-Share 

     

     

    Misconception Analysis 

     

     

    Whip Around 

     

     


  5. Observe your colleagues in the next faculty meeting. What nonverbal clues do they use to signal interest, questions, or confusion?
  6. Ask one of your colleagues to retell this chapter to you and practice using the retelling rubric.
  7. What are common student misconceptions in the subjects you teach? Where do these misconceptions come from and how should we address them? It is especially helpful to discuss these questions with people who teach courses similar to yours.
  8. Consider the example of history teacher Ted Clausen. What type of environment needs to be created such that students can discuss incorrect responses and identify flaws in the answers?

Chapter 3: Using Questioning to Check for Understanding

  1. Why has questioning been used to assess comprehension for so long?
  2. What types of questions help students think and provide teachers with an opportunity to check for understanding?
  3. Discuss the misuses of questioning in the classroom.
  4. As you read the chapter, update the strategy grid (below) by adding a description of the strategy in your own words and ways in which you can use this strategy to check for understanding. Share your ideas with others who use the same strategy.


    Strategy 

    Description 

    How I can use it ... 

    Constructing Effective Questions 

     

     

    Providing Nonverbal Support 

     

     

    Developing Authentic Questions 

     

     

    Response Cards 

     

     

    Hand Signals 

     

     

    Audience Response Systems 

     

     

    ReQuest 

     

     

    Socratic Seminar 

     

     


  5. Consider the QUILT framework for questioning. With a peer, identify a set of questions you could ask for an upcoming unit of study.
  6. Use the seven components of listening to assess the habits of your colleagues and/or your students as they talk with one another. What instruction might your students need to improve their listening? What might you do to improve yours?
  7. Consider the interaction between Ms. Jacobsen and her students. What is unique about this interaction? How does she engage her students through questioning? What questions would you like to ask her?

Chapter 4: Using Writing to Check for Understanding

  1. Recap your thinking thus far about the ways in which teachers can check for understanding. What happens as you write? Did you discover ideas that you didn't know you had? Did you clarify your thinking? Did you identify new questions?
  2. Discuss why writing can be used as an assessment tool across the curriculum and not just in English / language arts classes.
  3. Discuss the misuses of questioning in the classroom.
  4. As you read the chapter, update the strategy grid (below) by adding a description of the strategy in your own words and ways in which you can use this strategy to check for understanding. Share your ideas with others who use the same strategy.


    Strategy 

    Description 

    How I can use it ... 

    Interactive Writing 

     

     

    Read, Write, Pair, Share 

     

     

    Summary Writing 

     

     

    RAFT 

     

     


  5. Collect some student writing samples and meet with a colleague to determine whether or not the students understand the content. How does their writing inform you about their thinking?
  6. Discuss the difference between think-pair-share and read-write-pair-share. When would you use each? When is one more appropriate for checking for understanding?
  7. Summarize, on one page or less, your thoughts about checking for understanding. What skills did you use to accomplish this task? Were you successful? If so, why? If not, why not? Consider the instructional implications of summary writing based on your experiences.
  8. Write a series of RAFT prompts for your content area. Share them with colleagues and collect a variety of prompts you can use in your classroom.

Chapter 5: Using Projects and Performances to Check for Understanding

  1. What are the differences between projects and performances. When could each be used in checking for understanding?
  2. What projects or performances have you been involved with that were especially powerful for your own learning?
  3. Discuss the misuses of projects and performances in the classroom.
  4. As you read the chapter, update the strategy grid (below) by adding a description of the strategy in your own words and ways in which you can use this strategy to check for understanding. Share your ideas with others who use the same strategy.


    Strategy 

    Description 

    How I can use it ... 

    Readers' Theatre 

     

     

    Multimedia Presentations 

     

     

    Electronic and Paper Portfolios 

     

     

    Graphic Organizers 

     

     

    Inspiration® 

     

     

    Foldables 

     

     

    Dioramas 

     

     

    Public Performances 

     

     


  5. Discuss the four design principles for projects and performances. What are examples of each that have been used in situations where you were the learner? Have you been involved with projects or performances in which these design principles were not all in place? What happened?
  6. The students at Hoover High School produced videos as part of their learning project. How do you think that media and the Internet facilitate learning? What are the risks of using these types of tools?
  7. Talk with your colleagues about a public performance that you could create, linked to specific content standards, that would allow students an opportunity to demonstrate their learning with a larger audience.

Chapter 6: Using Tests to Check for Understanding

  1. Discuss a time when you had a formal test. How did you feel? What did you do to prepare for the exam? What types of knowledge were tapped on the test and what types of knowledge were not?
  2. Discuss the history of testing in schooling. Describe the uses of tests for accountability versus instruction.
  3. Discuss the misuses of tests in the classroom.
  4. As you read the chapter, update the strategy grid (below) by adding a description of the strategy in your own words and ways in which you can use this strategy to check for understanding. Share your ideas with others who use the same strategy.


    Strategy 

    Description 

    How I can use it ... 

    Multiple Choice 

     

     

    Short Answer 

     

     

    Dichotomous Choices 

     

     

    Essays 

     

     


  5. Select a content standard and develop at least two different types of test items (e.g., multiple choice, short answer, dichotomous choices, and essays). Discuss how the different items demonstrate student understanding and what each fails to show.
  6. Search online or in a bookstore/library for sample test items. Analyze these items for their strengths and weaknesses. Use the checklist in figure 6.2 to determine if the item meets minimum standards.

Chapter 7: Using Common Assessments and Consensus Scoring to Check for Understanding

  1. Discuss the importance of using data to improve student achievement. Note how assessments are useful in planning instruction.
  2. Review the protocol for using common assessments and do an inventory of your school. Which of these components are in place, or could be easily put in place? Which will require professional development and/or administrative support?
  3. As you read the chapter, update the strategy grid (below) by adding a description of the strategy in your own words and ways in which you can use this strategy to check for understanding. Share your ideas with others who use the same strategy.


    Strategy 

    Description 

    How I can use it ... 

    Pacing Guides 

     

     

    Instructional Materials and Arrangements 

     

     

    Common Assessments 

     

     

    Consensus Scoring and Item Analysis 

     

     

    Revising Pacing Guides, Assessments, Reteaching and Forming Intervention Groups 

     

     


Checking for Understanding: Formative Assessment Techniques for Your Classroom was written by Doug Fisher and Nancy Frey. This 170-page, 8" x 10" book (Stock # 107023; ISBN-13: 978-1-4166-0569-0) is available from ASCD for $20.95 (ASCD member) or $26.95 (nonmember). Copyright © 2007 by ASCD. To order a copy, call ASCD at 1-800-933-2723 (in Virginia 1-703-578-9600) and press 2 for the Service Center. Or buy the book from ASCD's Online Store.



Table of Contents



Copyright © 2007 by Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. All rights reserved. No part of this publication—including the drawings, graphs, illustrations, or chapters, except for brief quotations in critical reviews or articles—may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from ASCD.




Loading Comments...
MEMBER SIGN IN